A couple of people have forwarded this article to me, about a fellow called Thane Heins who seems to be claiming (in essence) that he's made a motor with better than 100% efficiency.
I, of course, will believe it when I see it. And I don'texpect to ever see it.
But the hook in the article is that Professor Markus Zahn of MIT was impressed - or at least confused - by the demonstration.
There's no real information about what actually happened in the demonstration, though. The closest they come to telling you is saying "He holds a permanent magnet a few centimetres away from the driveshaft of an electric motor, and the magnetic field it creates causes the motor to accelerate."
Well, yeah. Of course it does.
If you put stronger magnets in a permanent magnet motor, it'll give you more power from a given voltage. And consume more current. Its efficiency will probably actually drop.
And you certainly can demonstrate this effect by moving a powerful magnet close to a motor, such that the field from the external magnet supplements the field from the magnets inside the motor.
Behold, My Very First Metacafe Video, demonstrating the phenomenon with an unsuspecting motor and a honkin' great magnet:
From my fairly rusty understanding of electric motors, its been a while, I'm fairly sure this is a load of codswallop, I don't think back EMF will do what he wants it to be doing
I've taken a university-level course on AC and DC motors, magnetic circuits, and the like, and I am certain that some basic circuit analysis would show why this experiment is completely pointless. Essentially, he's moving (some of) the back EMF to a different location, but due to the whole equal-and-opposite-reaction thing, it's extremely doubtful it can be made to do any *useful* work (i.e. increase efficiency).
I don't remember enough specifics (the inner workings of electric motors are an extraordinarily dry subject in my mind) but the one thing I do recall is we *always* took measurements that would allow us to calculate efficiency and I don't see anything here to do that, thus making the whole exercise completely pointless. Call me back if a manufacturer picks up this guy's idea, but I don't think they're going to.
8 February 2008 at 6:02 pm
I noticed that he doesn't even mention the word Current, nor with his overly elaborate setup seem to be monitoring current at all.
9 February 2008 at 10:29 am
From my fairly rusty understanding of electric motors, its been a while, I'm fairly sure this is a load of codswallop, I don't think back EMF will do what he wants it to be doing
11 February 2008 at 5:04 am
I've taken a university-level course on AC and DC motors, magnetic circuits, and the like, and I am certain that some basic circuit analysis would show why this experiment is completely pointless. Essentially, he's moving (some of) the back EMF to a different location, but due to the whole equal-and-opposite-reaction thing, it's extremely doubtful it can be made to do any *useful* work (i.e. increase efficiency).
I don't remember enough specifics (the inner workings of electric motors are an extraordinarily dry subject in my mind) but the one thing I do recall is we *always* took measurements that would allow us to calculate efficiency and I don't see anything here to do that, thus making the whole exercise completely pointless. Call me back if a manufacturer picks up this guy's idea, but I don't think they're going to.