The other day I was shining a dangerously bright green laser through a Lichtenberg figure, as I'm sure all of you have done from time to time, and I discovered something interesting.
What?
Oh, all right. I'll explain.
This is a Lichtenberg figure.
Well, technically, the Lichtenberg figure is the feathery ferny shape inside the block of clear acrylic. The shape is a void burned into the plastic by a powerful electric discharge.
A Lichtenberg figure is, in brief, the shape of an electrical discharge. Specifically, it's the shape of an electrical discharge from an area to a point - sometimes over time, but usually all at once.
The acrylic-block type of Lichtenberg ornament is definitely of the all-at-once variety. To make one, you have to shoot your acrylic with a fairly high powered electron beam, also known as a cathode ray.
The electron beam in a Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) television or computer monitor - which, yes, actually is a kind of particle accelerator - delivers electrons with maybe 20,000 or 25,000 electron volts (20 to 25keV) of energy.
That's quite enough to produce considerable X-ray radiation when the electrons strike the inside of the tube - which is why CRTs are made from leaded, radiation-blocking glass - but it's only 1%, at best, of the energy you need to drive electrons even a centimetre or so into a plastic target.
If your electron beam is powerful enough to do that, several seconds of exposure will cause the plastic to acquire a absolutely terrific level of charge. Up in the low megavolts, and with total stored energy ranging from that of a tiny to that of a quite large pistol cartridge.
Then you bring an earthed contact close to one side of the block.
And bang, there's your Lichtenberg figure.
It's been speculated that the feathery tips of the figure are present all the way down to the molecular level.
The world's premiere - actually, pretty close to the world's only - supplier of Lichtenberg figures burned into clear acrylic blocks is Bert Hickman's Stoneridge Engineering. That's one of Bert's in the video above, and I've bought a total of three smaller figures from him over the years, from his eBay store here. This equilateral triangle figure is four inches on a side, and cost me $US24.95 plus postage.
As acrylic Lichtenberg figures get bigger, the energy needed to make them rises, and is soon well beyond what your common-or-garden medical LINAC can manage. This sort of accelerator is not something you can make at home; it's very difficult to get even 1MeV out of a homebuilt unit, even if you're the kind of kid who is only bullied by the members of the football team who didn't know about all the jocks at your old school whose hair and teeth fell out before they died.
You need something like one of the big blighters used to irradiate food. This is why Bert's real monsters are rather expensive.
When high energy electrons hit acrylic, they don't just settle peacefully into the polymer matrix. They actually hit hard enough to discolour the plastic on the side on which the beam enters. This effect is known as "solarisation", because it looks not unlike the discolouration caused by long exposure to ultraviolet radiation (which only has energy of about ten electron-volts).
The electrons actually end up charging the plastic a bit beyond the discoloured deceleration zone. So if you look at an acrylic Lichtenberg figure from the side...
...you can quite clearly see the discoloration and the Lichtenberg figure itself as separate layers.
The solarisation nestles around the Lichtenberg figure like a little bathtub. It fades out around the edges, but those edges rise up around the lightning-shape on all sides.
And this is what I noticed when I was fooling around with my laser.
Shining the laser through the un-solarised part of the figure...
...produced pretty much the effect you'd expect.
But shining it through the solarised portion...
...gave a, much brighter, amber diffusion glow. You can see the beam turning amber as it hits the solarised portion of the plastic.
There's no great mystery about why the beam looks brighter in the solarised area. That seems to simply be because it's travelling through damaged polymer that scatters more of the light.
But the distinct amber colour was a surprise.
Only the scattered light is amber; the main beam's the same colour coming out of the block as it was going in.
Here's the unsolarised side, again.
Another interesting thing about solarisation is that it heals. Over a few years, if you don't expose the acrylic to any more high-energy insults, the orange tint goes away.
The first Lichtenberg figure I bought from Bert was a little two-incher, which I purchased back in 2004. I can't remember whether it had visible solarisation when I got it, but it doesn't now - and a green laser beam stays green all the way through it.
UPDATE: Find some high-res video of acrylic Lichtenberg figures being made in this post!
3 December 2007 at 2:11 pm
Hey, dumb question here--isn't laser light supposed to be monochromatic? Are you telling me that the amber part of the block *changed green light into amber*?
3 December 2007 at 2:25 pm
Looks like fluorescence to me. Try it with a red laser and see what happens.
3 December 2007 at 4:22 pm
Hmm, not the first time here that this rule of lasers had been bent. Here he says he puts red gel filter over laser and red light comes out. wtf?
http://www.howtospotapsychopath.com/2007/11/30/a-bit-more-lasing/#comments
3 December 2007 at 4:25 pm
Ok, correction--red gel over the 'lens', I take it that means the picture-taking lens.
3 December 2007 at 9:53 pm
I thought it was dichroism, but I don't think green lasers emit anything but green.
So I reckon it's either fluorescence or maybe even Raman scattering. Not that I'm an expert.
Try it with a polarising filter and see what happens.
Also, blogsome is silently ignoring my posts when I log in as stewpot. Strange.
3 December 2007 at 10:12 pm
I can't see anything unusual happening when I shine a red laser through the block, but I don't have any high-powered red lasers, so I can't be certain.
A correctly-adjusted polariser eats all of the green speckle pattern visible along the amber beam, leaving the amber clearer and more visible, but otherwise unchanged.
(And the usual trippy stuff happens if I put the Lichtenberg figure between the polariser and a source of polarised light. Especially if I leave the acrylic block in its protective Ziploc bag!)
3 December 2007 at 10:14 pm
(Oh, and I see nothing wrong with the stewpot account, and there are no messages held for moderation or anything like that. Weird.)
4 December 2007 at 2:58 am
What you're seeing is almost certainly flourescence. The solarized portion is yellow, meaning it sucks up blue light, which means, in an organic, that there are likely structural features with extended delocalized pi electron systems. Such systems tend to absorb bluer light, and in the absence of a very strong fluoresence quencher, reemit to the red of the absorbed light. Absorbing doubled Nd:YAG light and reemitting it as orange strikes me as eminently reasonable. I've certainly seen similar behavior in blue-absorbing orgainc liquids many times. (I was using a 514 nm argon-ion laser, but the principal is the same.)
4 December 2007 at 3:00 am
And before anyone says anything, I do know that both the doubled YAG and the Ar+ laser are green; anything that absorbs strongly in the blue-UV will likely absorb a little bit in the green as well.
4 December 2007 at 6:22 am
Oh, and two more things:
First, the fact that the polarizer doesn't kill the yellow light is consistent with the idea that it's fluoresence, since fluoresence in an isotropic medium doesn't generally preserve the polarization of its exciting light.
Second, there may be a component of Raman scattering (scattering which shifts the energy of the exciting light by creating or annihilating vibrations in the medium) to the observed light. It's probably several orders of magnitude below the flouresence, but it would likely show up on a spectrometer.
4 December 2007 at 11:09 am
You'd probably see the fluorescence even with a low-power green laser (or a bright LED), especially if you filter out the green from the observer with an appropriate gel.
11 December 2007 at 5:27 am
I think it's fluorescence.
I see similar effects shining a green laser pointer through various other materials, including some liquid detergents and even beverages.
28 November 2008 at 11:40 am
I'm wondering about x-ray radiation, and the original experiments conducted by Roentgen. The X-Ray tube was developed by Roentgen using a Crookes tube, similar to the maltese cross cathode ray tube found here. I'm wondering how much input will cause significant x-rays from this tube, as I would like to experiment with this. Is there a certain input voltage that should be used to avoid x-ray radiation?
22 October 2020 at 7:53 pm
[…] Australia, Daniel Rutter, discovered that monochromatic light from a green laser pointer apparently changes color when passed through the solarized layer of a Lichtenberg figure. More recently, we have discovered […]
6 June 2022 at 6:39 pm
[…] Australia, Daniel Rutter, discovered that monochromatic light from a green laser pointer apparently changes color when passed through the solarized layer of a Lichtenberg figure. More recently, we have discovered […]